|
Title: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 idling at the station |
Description: |
Amtrak #634 (SDP40F) became ATSF 5261, BNSF 6971, and scrapped in 2002 |
Photo Date: |
9/18/1981 Upload Date: 7/10/2009 11:43:37 PM |
Location: |
Jacksonville, FL |
Author: |
Bernie Feltman |
Categories: |
Roster,Yard,Passenger |
Locomotives: |
AMTK 634(SDP40F) |
Views: |
1097 Comments: 5 |
|
|
|
Title: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 idling at the station |
Description: |
The challenge of beginning a nationwide system without nationwide standards is evident at the trio of fuel receptables |
Photo Date: |
9/18/1981 Upload Date: 7/11/2009 10:44:33 AM |
Location: |
Jacksonville, FL |
Author: |
Bernie Feltman |
Categories: |
Roster,Yard,Passenger |
Locomotives: |
AMTK 634(SDP40F) |
Views: |
922 Comments: 4 |
|
|
|
Title: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 |
Description: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 was built April 1974 on order #74611. After leaving Amtrak roster, unit became Santa Fe (ATSF) #5261, then BNSF 6971 before being scrapped in 2002 |
Photo Date: |
9/18/1981 Upload Date: 7/11/2009 10:43:26 AM |
Location: |
Jacksonville, FL |
Author: |
Bernie Feltman |
Categories: |
Roster,Yard,Passenger |
Locomotives: |
AMTK 634(SDP40F) |
Views: |
883 Comments: 7 |
|
|
|
Title: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 |
Description: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 was built April 1974 on order #74611. After leaving Amtrak roster, unit became Santa Fe (ATSF) #5261, then BNSF 6971 before being scrapped in 2002 |
Photo Date: |
9/18/1981 Upload Date: 7/11/2009 10:48:02 PM |
Location: |
Jacksonville, FL |
Author: |
Bernie Feltman |
Categories: |
Roster,Passenger |
Locomotives: |
AMTK 634(SDP40F) |
Views: |
839 Comments: 3 |
|
|
|
Title: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 idling at the station |
Description: |
Amtrak SDP40F #634 was built April 1974. After leaving Amtrak roster, became Santa Fe (ATSF) #5261, then BNSF #6971, and finally scrapped in 2002 |
Photo Date: |
9/18/1981 Upload Date: 7/11/2009 12:50:37 AM |
Location: |
Jacksonville, FL |
Author: |
Bernie Feltman |
Categories: |
Roster,Passenger |
Locomotives: |
AMTK 634(SDP40F) |
Views: |
1745 Comments: 10 |
|
|
|